DivingTalk

Go Back   DivingTalk > Scuba Diving Forums > Diving News

Diving News An area devoted to all the latest news from the world of scuba diving


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2008, 10:26 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: York, UK
Posts: 1,227
Send a message via AIM to Ally
Lightbulb Judge allows suit by abandoned diver

Quote:
A scuba diver abandoned off the coast of Newport Beach for four hours in 2004 can go forward with a $4-million lawsuit against the trip's organizers, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has ruled.

Dan Carlock of Santa Monica was 46 when he signed up for the dive organized by Ocean Adventures Dive Co. aboard a boat operated by Sun Diver Charters LLC of Huntington Beach.

About 12 miles off the coast, according to Carlock's lawsuit, he got separated from his dive buddy and was left behind; the boat's crew didn't report him missing until after a second dive at a different site.

Eventually, Carlock was rescued by a passing group of Boy Scouts and Sea Scouts on another boat, but not, his lawsuit contends, before suffering "substantial losses, including anguish and shock, embarrassment, humiliation" and skin cancer resulting from exposure to the sun.

Lawyers representing Sun Diver Charters and Ocean Adventures, at whom the lawsuit is aimed, had moved that the judge issue a summary judgment against Carlock on the grounds that, by participating in the dive, he had assumed certain risks -- thereby waiving his right to hold the operators responsible.

Judge Edward A. Ferns disagreed, however, ruling in a decision announced Wednesday that being abandoned at sea is not a risk inherent in the sport.

"Mr. Carlock is elated that the court has applied the law in the meticulous way that it did so as to provide protection for tens of thousands of recreational scuba divers throughout California and the nation," his lawyer, Scott P. Koepke, said Wednesday.

Stephen Hewitt, an attorney representing Ocean Adventures, expressed disappointment.

"All the defendants are united [in their opinion] that this is really an unfortunate accident," he said, "but it's a risk associated with boat diving and scuba diving."

The case is scheduled for trial June 9.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,7442333.story
Ally is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 01:10 PM   #2
Community Advisor

 
dalehall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 501
Default

Hmm.. I see you assuming responsibilty if you drown or have a "diving accident" and not be able to sue the operator for that type of stuff. But, if the SOB leaves me behind, that's pure negligence and I didn't sign a waiver excusing that. Espcially since the guy wasn't reported missing until AFTER a second dive!!!! There's no excuse for that. And, on top of all that, his buddy needs his @$$ kicked. Getting seperated is one thing, but leaving the site and diving eslewhere???
__________________
**D**
Dive Safe, Dive Often and Share Your Sport.
Website Blog Facebook DiveBuddy Adopt a Manatee
dalehall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On